Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate "unofficial" IRC channel to tor-friendly network #1571

Closed
mfc opened this issue Jan 3, 2016 · 17 comments
Closed

migrate "unofficial" IRC channel to tor-friendly network #1571

mfc opened this issue Jan 3, 2016 · 17 comments

Comments

@mfc
Copy link
Member

mfc commented Jan 3, 2016

currently, #qubes on irc.freenode.net is the unofficial QubesOS IRC channel according to the Qubes website.

freenode blocks tor connections. given that Qubes recommends users use torified whonix gateway for network traffic, it is weird to point them to a channel that they cannot access.

The Tor Project's IRC channel is on OTFC, as is Tails and Whonix.

It probably makes sense to instead advertise a #qubes channel on OTFC, which allows torified connections.

@adrelanos
Copy link
Member

We at Whonix have problems with OTFC and blocking Tor users also. Ticket:
Migrating from IRC OFTC to Tor friendly IRC network

@mfc
Copy link
Member Author

mfc commented Jan 3, 2016

do Tails and Tor Project face any issues with OTFC? I would find it surprising that they use OTFC if it is blocking users. That ticket makes it sounds ambiguous as to whether it was an individual issue rather than something confirmed by other users/devs.

@adrelanos
Copy link
Member

Not really specific to projects. HulaHoop user recently reported this
issue. I've experienced this issue myself not too long ago.

It's very much unlikely a Whonix specific issue. The connection works,
just the server rejects the user with the reason using a blacklisted IP.

I don't know what these project's workarounds are.

@mfc
Copy link
Member Author

mfc commented Jan 3, 2016

sounds like it is worth pinging Secure Desktops about it?

@mfc
Copy link
Member Author

mfc commented Jan 3, 2016

@cfcs
Copy link

cfcs commented Jan 4, 2016

OFTC on the other hand do not have DHE, so pick your poison.
I think Freenode are working on their Tor support.

@mfc
Copy link
Member Author

mfc commented Jan 4, 2016

FYI Tails is moving to Riseup's hosted IRC chatrooms:

https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2016-January/010005.html

info here: https://help.riseup.net/en/chat

@adrelanos
Copy link
Member

There is confirmation now, that OFTC causes issues for other users also:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2016-January/039823.html

I think Freenode are working on their Tor support.

They are doing that for years, yet I have not noticed any form of improvement and having greater issues connecting to freenode over Tor than OFTC.

@adrelanos
Copy link
Member

Michael Carbone:

FYI Tails is moving to Riseup's hosted IRC chatrooms:

https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2016-January/010005.html

info here: https://help.riseup.net/en/chat

Riseup only provides Jabber. Not IRC.

@mfc
Copy link
Member Author

mfc commented Jan 4, 2016

correct I was mistaken, they host multi-user chatrooms not IRC. Functionality seems equivalent though, the Tails folks seemed to find no problem with it.

@adrelanos
Copy link
Member

They're using it for developer chat set up by appointment. Not public
chat where people idle and sometimes chat. I think that makes a difference.

The question is if there are any clients that would provide the comfort
of having it run almost all the day. And if the type of IRC user
community would be willing to switch to jabber. In worst case, IRC plus
jabber would exist.

@mfc
Copy link
Member Author

mfc commented Jan 4, 2016

not sure what the difference is idling on jabber vs IRC.

however all users would need to have riseup.net jabber accounts I think, which is a much larger issue. so we can scrap that idea.

@adrelanos
Copy link
Member

not sure what the difference is idling on jabber vs IRC.

If you actively used IRC clients for years, and then tried to do the same with Jabber clients, you will know. I haven't seen any community public support channel move to Jabber yet. (It's probably not the protocol that lacks something, but the clients.)

@adrelanos
Copy link
Member

Jabber, as far as I observed it, always needs users to register an account. Accounts on IRC are most times optional. Maybe that's one point why it's less popular for public chat.

@bnvk
Copy link

bnvk commented Jan 4, 2016

@mfc I think what @adrelanos is talking about is how a lot (most?) users in an IRC room, are not actually there meaning online, but are rather "in the room" still. This is because a lot of people run screen or tmux from a server so can turn off their laptop but still get messages from people at the IRC identity!

@mfc
Copy link
Member Author

mfc commented Feb 18, 2016

OTFC works fine for me, though it has a self-signed cert. Can't even connect to freenode because of Tor blocking. I propose for now promoting using OTFC and go from there.

@mfc
Copy link
Member Author

mfc commented Feb 18, 2016

changed on website to OFTC -- thanks @axon-qubes for correcting.... >.<

if Tor, Whonix, Tails moves somewhere else we can always change it.

@mfc mfc closed this as completed Feb 18, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants