Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider implementing the Qiskit backend interface #30

Open
frankharkins opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider implementing the Qiskit backend interface #30

frankharkins opened this issue Mar 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@frankharkins
Copy link
Contributor

frankharkins commented Mar 1, 2024

Consider adapting the spinoza_to_qiskit.py example into a proper Qiskit backend. This would allow users to follow the conventional Qiskit execution pattern.

from qiskit import QuantumCircuit, transpile
from spynoza import Simulator  # qiskit.providers.BackendV2 object

sim = Simulator()
qc = QuantumCircuit(...)
tqc = transpile(qc, sim)
sim.run(tqc)

See Qiskit's Backend documentation for more information, but also feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need any support.

@frankharkins frankharkins changed the title Consider implementing the Qiskit providers interface Consider implementing the Qiskit backend interface Mar 8, 2024
@smu160 smu160 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants