Pin numpy<2.2 in lint workflow (backport #722)

[mergify]

Somehow, with numpy 2.2, the mypy fails with the following error:

qiskit_addon_cutting/cut_finding/circuit_interface.py:318: error: No overload variant of "__getitem__" of "Sequence" matches argument type "signedinteger[_32Bit | _64Bit]"  [call-overload]
qiskit_addon_cutting/cut_finding/circuit_interface.py:318: note: Possible overload variants:
qiskit_addon_cutting/cut_finding/circuit_interface.py:318: note:     def __getitem__(self, int, /) -> int | tuple[str, int]
qiskit_addon_cutting/cut_finding/circuit_interface.py:318: note:     def __getitem__(self, slice, /) -> Sequence[int | tuple[str, int]]
qiskit_addon_cutting/cut_finding/disjoint_subcircuits_state.py:330: error: Invalid index type "Hashable" for "ndarray[tuple[int, ...], dtype[signedinteger[_32Bit | _64Bit]]]"; expected type "SupportsIndex | slice | EllipsisType | _SupportsArray[dtype[numpy.bool[builtins.bool]] | dtype[integer[Any]]] | _NestedSequence[_SupportsArray[dtype[numpy.bool[builtins.bool]] | dtype[integer[Any]]]] | builtins.bool | int | _NestedSequence[builtins.bool | int] | tuple[SupportsIndex | slice | EllipsisType | _SupportsArray[dtype[numpy.bool[builtins.bool]] | dtype[integer[Any]]] | _NestedSequence[_SupportsArray[dtype[numpy.bool[builtins.bool]] | dtype[integer[Any]]]] | builtins.bool | int | _NestedSequence[builtins.bool | int] | None, ...] | None"  [index]

Hence we pin numpy as a workaround.

---

This is an automatic backport of pull request #722 done by Mergify.

[mergify]

Cherry-pick of d44ca0a has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/stable/0.9/pr-722
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/stable/0.9'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit d44ca0a.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
	both modified:   pyproject.toml

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12305159558

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 12299527356:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	2330
Relevant Lines:	2330

---

💛 - Coveralls