Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible HTTP Response Splitting Vulnerability #217

Closed
liquidworm opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Possible HTTP Response Splitting Vulnerability #217

liquidworm opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@liquidworm
Copy link

Hi,

Please review the published advisory, probably it's in the API WebOb which is not documented here: http://docs.webob.org/en/latest/api/exceptions.html

Probably there are other WebOb applications with similar issues.

Here is the advisory: http://www.zeroscience.mk/en/vulnerabilities/ZSL-2015-5267.php

Thanks

@digitalresistor
Copy link
Member

Okay, so some sample code to make this a little more clear:

def test_HTTPMove_location_newlines():
    def start_response(status, headers, exc_info=None):
        print(headers)
        pass
    environ = {
       'wsgi.url_scheme': 'HTTP',
       'SERVER_NAME': 'localhost',
       'SERVER_PORT': '80',
       'REQUEST_METHOD': 'HEAD',
       'PATH_INFO': '/',
    }
    m = webob_exc._HTTPMove(location='http://example.com\r\nX-Test: false')
    m( environ, start_response )

The data that is printed is:

[
    ('Content-Type', 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'),
    ('Content-Length', '0'),
    ('Location', 'http://example.com\r\nX-Test: false')
]

This is passed off to start_response(), which is generally provided by a WSGI compatible server. I don't believe it's WebOb's responsibility to sanitize header information being sent to the WSGI server.

@GrahamDumpleton
Copy link

FWIW. Apache/mod_wsgi should raise a ValueError exception out of start_response() if given a header value with embedded \r or \n.

Many other WSGI servers, if not perhaps all of them, don't bother with such validation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants