You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that issue #1598 appears to have been insta-locked without discussion; I imagine this is accidental (perhaps an automated process?), as the issue does bring up a good point on legacy support for a now-deprecated installation / configuration method, and usage of a new method that is adopted by a large amount of projects and now has beta support by setuptools.
I would be interested in discussing this issue further, as I use flake8 on a lot of downstream projects and supporting this legacy setup.cfg configuration method is fast becoming an exception that I have to make for flake8 alone. I would ask that issue #1598 be unlocked so as to have a place to discuss this, if that is convenient for you. Thank you for your time!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
describe the request
I noticed that issue #1598 appears to have been insta-locked without discussion; I imagine this is accidental (perhaps an automated process?), as the issue does bring up a good point on legacy support for a now-deprecated installation / configuration method, and usage of a new method that is adopted by a large amount of projects and now has beta support by
setuptools
.I would be interested in discussing this issue further, as I use
flake8
on a lot of downstream projects and supporting this legacysetup.cfg
configuration method is fast becoming an exception that I have to make forflake8
alone. I would ask that issue #1598 be unlocked so as to have a place to discuss this, if that is convenient for you. Thank you for your time!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: