Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 22, 2020. It is now read-only.

Write case-study based on the proper usage of the library #57

Open
PumpkinSeed opened this issue Oct 2, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Write case-study based on the proper usage of the library #57

PumpkinSeed opened this issue Oct 2, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation testing Test related issues
Milestone

Comments

@PumpkinSeed
Copy link
Owner

Based on the current usage it should have a case-study which proves the library is doing what it should do, and following the best practices of Couchbase.

@PumpkinSeed PumpkinSeed added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation testing Test related issues labels Oct 2, 2019
@PumpkinSeed PumpkinSeed added this to the 0.1.0 milestone Oct 3, 2019
@PumpkinSeed PumpkinSeed reopened this Oct 8, 2019
@PumpkinSeed PumpkinSeed modified the milestones: 0.1.0, 0.1.2 Oct 8, 2019
@borosr
Copy link
Collaborator

borosr commented Oct 8, 2019

  • SetDocumentType usage
  • Get usage
  • Upsert usage
  • Remove usage
  • Touch usage
  • Ping usage

@borosr
Copy link
Collaborator

borosr commented Oct 8, 2019

Touch scenario:

  1. Generate documents with expiry time(x)
  2. Wait x/2 sec
  3. Touch half of them
  4. Wait x sec
  5. Get documents and the results length must be half of the insert count

@PumpkinSeed PumpkinSeed modified the milestones: 0.1.2, 0.1.3, 0.2.0 Oct 11, 2019
@PumpkinSeed
Copy link
Owner Author

Can we add this to the case-study. This is valid enough to make it happen.
https://blog.couchbase.com/user-profile-store-advanced-data-modeling/

@PumpkinSeed PumpkinSeed modified the milestones: 0.2.0, 0.1.4 Oct 15, 2019
@PumpkinSeed
Copy link
Owner Author

Once the 0.1.4 finished we should run another run with this.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation testing Test related issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants