We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://github.com/Rantanen/node-dtls/blob/master/BufferBuilder.js is using a similar method than in protodef :
They are using a buffer reader and builder helpers which allow them to not care about offsets.
There might be interesting ideas in there we could use.
And it would be cool if protodef could be used in that kind of lib.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://github.com/Rantanen/node-dtls/blob/master/packets/PacketSpec.js
I think I'll try to get rid of offset, size and sizeOf throughout protodef (but keeping it sync ! No functionality change, just code improvement)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Low priority, I don't want that kind of thing to slow down ProtoDef progress again.
No branches or pull requests
https://github.com/Rantanen/node-dtls/blob/master/BufferBuilder.js is using a similar method than in protodef :
They are using a buffer reader and builder helpers which allow them to not care about offsets.
There might be interesting ideas in there we could use.
And it would be cool if protodef could be used in that kind of lib.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: