PAM would like flux surfaces on R,theta grid (IMAS.fluxsurfaces?)

[TimSlendebroek]

Talking with Joey and adding PAM to FUSE, PAM would like the flux surfaces on the r,theta grid.

From PAM['LIB']['plasmainfo'] : gEQDSK['fluxSurfaces'].resample(npts=tgrid, technique='uniform')
Also note that we can generate the grid from contours but they need to be uniformily sampled (technique='uniform')

Let's make IMAS.fluxsurfaces(dd) create a second profiles_2d[2] with grid1=r, grid2=theta ? @orso82

[orso82]

Yes, that would be easy to do. We need to take the flux surfaces and re-interpolate them to have the same theta.

[jcandy]

If it makes sense, I would suggest mapping once to MHX coefficients and then using that for any reinterpolation. Reinterpolating contours seems ugly/lossy.

[orso82]

Indeed @jcandy . We already fit MXH to each of the flux surfaces, so that's the way we should do it!