Can't creat contribution online

[FamilleLeDu]

Hello,

I'm searching a solution about an unexpected error message.
We have a contribution page on line (CiviContribute) associeted to a payment processor. 
When the user valid the form, he receive the message "Expected one PaymentProcessor but found 6"

 In the log file : 

2025-01-06 13:43:38+0100 [debug] org.project60.sepa: get_parameter for unknown key: pp_buffer_days
2025-01-06 13:43:38+0100 [debug] SepaPP: createPendingMandate for contribution ID []
2025-01-06 13:43:38+0100 [debug] SepaPP: getPendingContributionID couldn't find a contribution ID.
2025-01-06 13:43:38+0100 [debug] SepaPP: createPendingMandate had nothing to do
2025-01-06 13:43:43+0100 [debug] SepaPP: createPendingMandate for contribution ID []
2025-01-06 13:43:43+0100 [debug] SepaPP: releasePendingMandateData for contribution ID [5072]
2025-01-06 13:43:43+0100 [debug] org.project60.sepa: get_parameter for unknown key: pp_buffer_days

Version :
CiviCRM 5.75.2
WorldPress : 6.7.1
PHP : 8.1
CiviSEPA : 1.12-alpha2
SEPAPP : 1.2-beta4

Do you already encounter this type of issue ?

[vurt2]

This looks like #17 ... It should be fixed for the NG processor in 1.2-beta4. Are you using NG?

[FamilleLeDu]

Yes, we use NG (SEPA Direct Debit (New))

[vurt2]

Thank you for the report. I think it is a regression... I will try to provide a fix this week.

[FamilleLeDu]

Hello, do you have some news about this issue ? We are quite bothered by this problem. Can we do something to help you ? I'll try to find the issue in the source code but I'm not a developer on PHP and CIVICRM.

[vurt2]

Just in this moment I released 1.2-beta5 which will hopefully fix your problem. Please test and report back - this is a great help!

[FamilleLeDu]

Hello, Thank you for your effort. But I just tested 1.2-beta5 and we have the same message "Expected one PaymentProcessor but found 6" :-(

[vurt2]

Sorry to hear that. What happens when you revert back to 1.2-beta3? Does this work?

[FamilleLeDu]

Hello,
I revert back to 1.2-beta3. It's work !!! I need to test more but first test seems to be ok.
I will deploy the version en Production env.

[vurt2]

That is good to hear. I will report back when there is a new version that fixes the regression.