access=customers should be treated as private

[MichalPP]

restricting access to customers should be treated as either delivery (very significant turn penalty) or private (disallow traffic).

after I've allowed a lot of barriers ( #3890 ) in the foot profile, many shortcuts through shops became routable, even though they were correctly marked as access=customers.

how is access=customers treated in your regions?

[daniel-j-h]

We put a high turn penalty on turns onto such restricted ways. Check out

• Making Travel Time and Edge Weights Independent (en)
• Trennung von Geschwindigkeiten und Kantengewichten (de)
• https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/blob/master/profiles/car.lua#L84-L89
• https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/blob/master/profiles/car.lua#L419-L421
• and if you have ideas for more tags Penalize turns onto ways with restricted access: fees, customers #3745

[daniel-j-h]

Noting here: this is active in the car profile only at the moment. I see no reason we shouldn't do this in the bike and walk profile - @karenzshea any insights here? Was this intentionally left out of the bike and walk profile?

cc @emiltin

[emiltin]

seems like a good idea to avoid these type of ways for foot and bike as well

[github-actions]

This issue seems to be stale. It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs.