You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Investigating Path queries, and I noticed this quirk of sessions where they can't be longer than 30 minutes. (more in point #3 here: #4884 (comment) )
This has implications for the new work we want to do on Paths, particularly:
(1) Infinite path expansion for a user becomes impossible if their sessions lasted longer than 30 minutes (split into multiple sessions, new session starts at a point "in the middle" of the path.
(2) With steps between funnels, conversion times > 30 minutes imply we would get a wrong picture of what went on with the user. This is dangerous, if not downright wrong.
(3) All Path visualisations where a person did things over a longer timeframe get broken out.
I think this reduces the efficacy of what we want to achieve with Paths.
On the flipside, I do get that a new day is a new session, and depending on what question you want to answer, you might want to consider this as a separate user.
Raising this issue to (1) Understand the historical context for 30 minute sessions. and (2) Hear your thoughts on doing away with this constraint (maybe just for paths, if valid historical context).
That makes a lot more sense, sounds like just a borked query assumption then! (or maybe I'm reading the query wrong). But thanks, that clears things out for me :)
Investigating Path queries, and I noticed this quirk of sessions where they can't be longer than 30 minutes. (more in point #3 here: #4884 (comment) )
This has implications for the new work we want to do on Paths, particularly:
(1) Infinite path expansion for a user becomes impossible if their sessions lasted longer than 30 minutes (split into multiple sessions, new session starts at a point "in the middle" of the path.
(2) With steps between funnels, conversion times > 30 minutes imply we would get a wrong picture of what went on with the user. This is dangerous, if not downright wrong.
(3) All Path visualisations where a person did things over a longer timeframe get broken out.
I think this reduces the efficacy of what we want to achieve with Paths.
On the flipside, I do get that a new day is a new session, and depending on what question you want to answer, you might want to consider this as a separate user.
Raising this issue to (1) Understand the historical context for 30 minute sessions. and (2) Hear your thoughts on doing away with this constraint (maybe just for paths, if valid historical context).
Thoughts? @macobo @EDsCODE @Twixes @paolodamico @marcushyett-ph
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: