Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plugin Editor needs a built-in testing tool #2768

Closed
yakkomajuri opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Plugin Editor needs a built-in testing tool #2768

yakkomajuri opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale

Comments

@yakkomajuri
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Please describe.

Describe the solution you'd like

To be more useful than frustrating, I think the plugin editor would need a "test" or "dry run" mechanism where it runs a test event by the plugin and shows me the resulting event (scheduled plugins aside). This is what RudderStack does (haven't checked Segment but would assume that much) and it makes building the plugin much easier.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

Thank you for your feature request – we love each and every one!

@yakkomajuri yakkomajuri added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 15, 2020
@Twixes
Copy link
Member

Twixes commented Jun 3, 2021

From our planning today, we arrived at the idea of running this locally browser-side. Will require some functionality mocked, some imports polyfilled and maybe something more advanced restricted, but saves us from a lot of server side work on safety, particularly on Cloud.

@mariusandra
Copy link
Collaborator

The only way this will be usable (vs frustrating because of lack of x, y, and z) is via something like this: https://blog.stackblitz.com/posts/introducing-webcontainers/ . If that's technically feasible I don't know. It might be worth a small investigation though.

@posthog-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue hasn't seen activity in two years! If you want to keep it open, post a comment or remove the stale label – otherwise this will be closed in two weeks.

@posthog-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue was closed due to lack of activity. Feel free to reopen if it's still relevant.

@posthog-bot posthog-bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants