Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Issue] Considering all pokemon as VIP #5538

Closed
pranavperfect opened this issue Sep 19, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

[Issue] Considering all pokemon as VIP #5538

pranavperfect opened this issue Sep 19, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@pranavperfect
Copy link

Expected Behavior

Treat only unseen, or IV above 1500 or CP above 0.9 or listed pokemon as VIP

Actual Behavior

Treated Meowth and Mankey as VIP

Your FULL config.json (remove your username, password, gmapkey and any other private info)

http://pastebin.com/m5JJJjVf

Output when issue occurred

[2016-09-18 19:09:58] [MainThread] [PokemonCatchWorker] [INFO] A wild Meowth appeared! (CP: 495) (NCP: 0.66) (Potential 0.36) (A/D/S 12/2/2)
[2016-09-18 19:10:01] [MainThread] [PokemonCatchWorker] [INFO] This is a VIP pokemon. Catch!!!
[2016-09-18 19:11:19] [MainThread] [PokemonCatchWorker] [INFO] A wild Mankey appeared! (CP: 302) (NCP: 0.34) (Potential 0.18) (A/D/S 5/3/0)
[2016-09-18 19:11:22] [MainThread] [PokemonCatchWorker] [INFO] This is a VIP pokemon. Catch!!!

Steps to Reproduce

Run bot on latest build

Other Information

OS:
Win 10
Branch:
Master
Git Commit:
fef7694
Python Version:
2.7.6

@ntanto
Copy link

ntanto commented Sep 19, 2016

"treat_unseen_as_vip": true,

@pranavperfect
Copy link
Author

yes. So? unseen refers to not in pokedex right? this setting has been present in the config for many builds. i've not faced this problem until now.

@Gobberwart
Copy link
Contributor

Please stop posting this issue We know, it's been fixed in dev, and will be in master soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants