BUG: Settings/Repository : Doesn't works as expected.

[Kreyren]

Expected behavior

Move priority of repositories, and not ripping my hair off my head

Actual behavior

https://youtu.be/gC8lazCn4nM?t=62

Steps to reproduce

Try to change repository priority in settings

System information

[Kreyren]

Blocker for PhoenicisOrg/scripts#854 (comment)

[plata]

Please use a title and description which is a bit more explanatory.

[Kreyren]

@plata sorry didn't realize that i had wrong resolution on obs, will reupload

[Kreyren]

@plata Actual behavior reuploaded, notice that phoenicis hard freezes when repository is dragged

[plata]

Closed because issue is not described in a way that the observed problem can be reproduced or understood which makes it impossible to handle this.

[Kreyren]

@plata https://youtu.be/gC8lazCn4nM?t=65

What else do you want? The issue is that it's pita to change the priority order of provided source for scripts

[plata]

We need a textual description of the behavior, what you do not like about it and how you think it should be improved.

[Kreyren]

Actuall

I try to move repository and it sticks to my pointer without me beeing able to escape it moving it everywhere else then expected in the process + Is not intuitive.

[plata]

So issue should be: Selected item cannot be released when trying to re-order repositories. Is this correct?

[Kreyren]

it rather seems to be moving priority on random when end-user tries to change it's position and it's confusing and infuriating to use..

[plata]

Can you come up with a title and textual descriptions which describes this properly? Like I stated above, we need something which is clearly understandable for everybody. If so, I would be willing to re-open the issue.

[Kreyren]

i see what i can do

[madoar]

The issue sounds familiar to me. @plata didn't I have this issue before I forces JavaFX to use GTK 2 instead of GTK 3?

@Kreyren are you using GTK 2 or 3?

[plata]

Can't quite remember.

[madoar]

@Kreyren see also #1778 (comment)

[Kreyren]

@madoar if it would work this way i would be happy, recommends also release the change once MOUSE1 is release so that you woudn't have to click, drag, click again -> click, drag, release MOUSE1 expected.