Document fiscal sponsorship modeling #1506
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1506 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.10% 87.10%
=======================================
Files 243 243
Lines 3048 3048
Branches 420 420
=======================================
Hits 2655 2655
Misses 393 393 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
| @@ -25,6 +32,10 @@ returned value may come from a separate data source, such as a proposal to a | |||
| funder, a data platform provider (DataProvider in PDC), or the changemakers | |||
| themselves. As of this writing values come solely from proposals. | |||
|
|
|||
| Rich field values ("gold" data) are returned in changemaker `fields`. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What does "Rich" mean in this context? How is it related to "gold" data? I understand "gold" in this context, as a term of art that we've defined elsewhere, but I don't understand what "rich" means (and the real-world tie-in between gold and richness is a possible source of confusion here).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The purpose of having two separate sentences here is to describe the two separate lists (one named fields, one named fiscalSponsors) returned in the changemaker response body.
Both the parenthetical and the preceding paragraph provide the context for this note. Should I put it into the above paragraph? Rich is a better description than "gold" but I wanted to link the two here in case you've only ever heard of "gold" data. Should I eliminate either of those words? Ditch "rich" and keep "gold"?
Issue #1485 Support fiscal sponsor relationships between changemakers
bickelj
force-pushed
the
fiscal-sponsorship-documentation
branch
from
8f3dbf9 to
7e92c33
Compare
Issue #1485 Support fiscal sponsor relationships between changemakers