Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Practical value of certification #137

Open
vchaplygim opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Practical value of certification #137

vchaplygim opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@vchaplygim
Copy link

Hi, there is a suggestion to supplement the brief description of all certifications with the following information:

  1. Practical Exam (or Performance based exam)
  2. Theoretical exam (or multi-choice exam)

It is also possible to visually change the brightness of the color of the block for such a division: the practical exam is a brighter block, the theoretical exam is less bright.

PS Now it is most often possible to understand theoretical certification or practical certification only by going to the page of the course/certification vendor.

PPS Perhaps it is worth implementing a filter by conditional value among the community separately.

Example, below are valuable certifications, the exam of which is not just answers to questions, but consists in solving practical problems close to production on laboratory stands.

Screenshot 2024-10-01 at 6 33 49 PM Screenshot 2024-10-01 at 6 33 59 PM
@sinecurelife
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @vchaplygim , in the Javascript version I'm working on I plan to have a lot more information on the certification card. I will definitely add a true/false field for Practical Exam, Theoretical Exam, and interview requirements.

Here's a mock-up of the new certification card:
image

@vchaplygim
Copy link
Author

Hi @sinecurelife, thank you for your answer! It looks great, but I understand that the example does not yet have fields about the practical exam or not?

@sinecurelife
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes you're right, that option is not on the mock up but is on my feature list. I don't foresee why that data point can't make it to the first version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants