You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello! I succesfully integrate the library is great! But When it was used in a semi-prod environment, it elevates the cpu usage, and it was because when you look for the notifications use channel and payload as filters, those fields has no indexes due to that the queries are realy low.
So, adding a multi-field index, do the trick for us.
You can considere add it as main part
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I will try to add that in the next version of this library. Perhaps however the index should be optional, since adding an index on an already large/active table can sometimes be tricky in production.
Feel free to share the code you added or submit a pull request with the proposed change, otherwise I will look at it whenever I have time :)
Hello! I succesfully integrate the library is great! But When it was used in a semi-prod environment, it elevates the cpu usage, and it was because when you look for the notifications use channel and payload as filters, those fields has no indexes due to that the queries are realy low.
So, adding a multi-field index, do the trick for us.
You can considere add it as main part
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: