Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement switching templates during a retro UI #9087

Closed
6 tasks
nickoferrall opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #9093
Closed
6 tasks

Implement switching templates during a retro UI #9087

nickoferrall opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #9093

Comments

@nickoferrall
Copy link
Contributor

nickoferrall commented Oct 31, 2023

See design issue here: #9047

Figma designs here: https://www.figma.com/file/3mCDNSuJeByj3jiMeGm7yb/Change-retro-template-within-meeting?type=design&node-id=1-1006&mode=design&t=vXi8NP08RgHAYSX4-0

AC

  • Show options button in retro meeting, just like Standups
  • A dropdown menu opens with "Change template"
  • If a reflection has been added to the meeting, "Change template" is disabled. A tooltip pops-up when hovering over it explaining that you can only change the template before a reflection has been added
  • Clicking "Change template" opens a right drawer with the templates
  • Clicking a template does nothing. The logic will be handled in a subsequent issue.
  • The options button only shows up in the reflect phase as you can't change the template in other phases. This can be changed when we add recurring retros.
@jordanh
Copy link
Contributor

jordanh commented Mar 15, 2024

Going to icebox this for now

@Dschoordsch
Copy link
Contributor

I un-iceboxed the issue. We figured this might be an important part of recurring retros, so the user still has the option to change the template. It should be mostly done, just needs merging of the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Status: 📋Todo
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants