You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From Abby:
Currently, if there are variants listed in a .meta file that have the same position, and both variants exist in the dataset, only one will be returned and included in the score, even when minWinSize=0. It would be nice to have an option (perhaps a minWinSize=-1 or something similar) where every variant in .meta that exists in the dataset would be included (I.e. no variants would be left out simply because of the same or a nearby position). This would be helpful for instances where a score generated from variants all within a gene/similar location and overlap/close proximity of variants is likely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
the same name for different chr/position/ref/alt (preferably with the same position, just different alts) -> should throw an exception that you need to manually change the names to be unique, but will be supported when that happens
the same name for the same chr/position/ref/alt (accidental duplicated line; we can't support this)
different names for the same chr/position/ref/alt (problem we can't support)
From Abby:
Currently, if there are variants listed in a .meta file that have the same position, and both variants exist in the dataset, only one will be returned and included in the score, even when minWinSize=0. It would be nice to have an option (perhaps a minWinSize=-1 or something similar) where every variant in .meta that exists in the dataset would be included (I.e. no variants would be left out simply because of the same or a nearby position). This would be helpful for instances where a score generated from variants all within a gene/similar location and overlap/close proximity of variants is likely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: