-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is geopackage-validator a suitable tool for validating gpkg in general (not specifically for PDOK) #115
Comments
I Geopackages are a data format that have a deliberately broad application, so many of the requirements are dependent on your use. Excluding the legacy ones the validations that you need in case you want to have a valid geopackage:
I would advise:
Dependend on your situation:
PDOK specific:
The table:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I was looking for a tool for validating my geopackages and I found this one. I only read the documentation cursorily and missed the fact that it was built specifically to validate for PDOK-requirements. I only realized this a few days later. I am not working with/for PDOK, and in fact I never heard of it before.
It seems this tool was built/supported/sponsored by Dutch authorities to meet their needs and my needs/questions are outside the scope. But perhaps this question will help others like me looking for such tools :)
Which of the RQ and RC are specific for PDOK? If most of them are, then perhaps there are better tools for validating geopackages that I should use intstead. Are you able to recommend other tools for validating geopackage files when not writing for PDOK?
Sincerely
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: