Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SF feature request #57 - Rewrite PDL/Dataflow.pod #324

Closed
mohawk2 opened this issue Jul 30, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

SF feature request #57 - Rewrite PDL/Dataflow.pod #324

mohawk2 opened this issue Jul 30, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@mohawk2
Copy link
Member

mohawk2 commented Jul 30, 2021

https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/feature-requests/57/

PDL::Dataflow needs to be gone over with a fine-toothed comb. For example, the DESCRIPTION section is just wrong. Probably the rest of the document could be updated for what actually got implemented, not just Tuomas' now 14-year-old vision of what might be done, but wasn't. Dataflow is potentially confusing enough without having an outdated manual.

@mohawk2 mohawk2 added the cat:doc label Jan 4, 2022
@mohawk2
Copy link
Member Author

mohawk2 commented Jan 4, 2022

The DESCRIPTION (no dataflow forwards by default but you can turn it on) is not in fact wrong. That behaviour is tested in t/thread.t and has been for many years.

@mohawk2
Copy link
Member Author

mohawk2 commented Apr 17, 2022

And the above-linked commit actually largely rewrites the Dataflow doc in line with the current reality (and a bit of future ideas for event stuff).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant