Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(api): fix module path for jupyter notebook #8009

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2021

Conversation

Laura-Danielle
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Closes #7959. We should use the absolute path for modules, otherwise jupyter notebook will not be able to find the correct port to connect to the module.

Changelog

  • Change port path from dev/ot_module* to /dev/ot_module*

Review requests

Pls make sure this didn't break anything. Run module protocol in the app and also in jupyter notebook. Disconnect/Reconnect modules a few times.

Risk assessment

Medium.

@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle added the fix PR fixes a bug label Jun 24, 2021
@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle requested review from a team June 24, 2021 21:09
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 24, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (edge@fe4d6db). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             edge    #8009   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   85.88%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      348           
  Lines           ?    21254           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    18253           
  Misses          ?     3001           
  Partials        ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fe4d6db...4bfd80c. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@amitlissack amitlissack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't test it, but looks good to me.

Copy link

@nusrat813 nusrat813 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested, LGTM

@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle merged commit f8bdf5c into edge Jun 28, 2021
@Laura-Danielle Laura-Danielle deleted the fix_juypter_module_connection branch June 28, 2021 17:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix PR fixes a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: Update from 4.3.1 -> 4.4.0 adds ThreadManagerException to software
3 participants