Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Api Documentation for local control #12

Closed
niemyjski opened this issue Dec 31, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Api Documentation for local control #12

niemyjski opened this issue Dec 31, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@niemyjski
Copy link

Will this api documentation work for talking to your hub mini locally? Controlling the devices locally without the cloud is extremely important.

@niemyjski niemyjski added the question Further information is requested label Dec 31, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

@niemyjski - this issue is being automatically closed because it does not follow either the feature request, support request, or bug report issue template. The issue templates have been designed to help in the troubleshooting (or feature request) process. Please use them and populate it as completely as possible to streamline troubleshooting or feature request discussions.

@SwitchBot-Wonderlabs
Copy link
Member

Hey, @niemyjski , I'm sorry that it can't, and there is no such plan at present.

@niemyjski
Copy link
Author

niemyjski commented Jan 7, 2021

There is a wave in smart home tech to run local, would be great to be on board or provide HomeKit support :). Going forward I will not be buying any products that don't run local in some way shape or form unless there are none in that category and diy isn't easy. Having a local api immediately boosts that product to the top of my list even if it's not of the same quality

@strunker
Copy link
Contributor

strunker commented Jan 7, 2021

I agree, and I feel slightly misled because prior to purchasing I had read that the hub was rumored to have an API in development. And when I read that I thought cool its local to the hub. Then I read the docs and realized.. It wasn't..

@niemyjski
Copy link
Author

niemyjski commented Jan 7, 2021

Same here, I previously opened #13 after this was closed due to a format issue but just opened a feature request (#19)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants