Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Progress on the purine analogue of OSM-S-106 #558

Open
mbhebhe opened this issue Jan 11, 2018 · 7 comments
Open

Progress on the purine analogue of OSM-S-106 #558

mbhebhe opened this issue Jan 11, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@mbhebhe
Copy link

mbhebhe commented Jan 11, 2018

I am currently still trying to synthesise the purine analogue of OSM-S-106 to see if changing the scaffold improves the potency.
The chlorination of hypoxanthine in the presence of (MNB16), seems to work in the presence of N,N-dimethylaniline (DMA). The reaction does not go fully to completion, the product is water soluble and I am struggling to separate it from the starting material. I tried a small scale bromination on the pure-ish chloropurine. I tried with NBS at RT and this did not give the product. I tried with NBS and refluxing and that also didn't give the product. I tried using n-BuLi and bromine but that did not give the product either (MNB18). I will try again with a higher equivalence of n-BuLi.
If all works, I should be able to make the purine analogue of OSM-S-106

image

Strings for analogue
SMILES: NC1=C2C(N=C(C3=CC(S(N)(=O)=O)=CC=C3)N2)=NC=N1
InChI=1S/C11H10N6O2S/c12-9-8-11(15-5-14-9)17-10(16-8)6-2-1-3-7(4-6)20(13,18)19/h1-5H,(H2,13,18,19)(H3,12,14,15,16,17)
InChl Key: HZCPYUQRICAMHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N

@mbhebhe mbhebhe self-assigned this Jan 11, 2018
@mbhebhe mbhebhe changed the title Progress on the synthesis the purine analogue of OSM-S-106 Progress on the purine analogue of OSM-S-106 Jan 11, 2018
@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

MFernflower commented Jan 11, 2018

@mbhebhe Wouldn't Methyllithium be more reactive thus meaning you need less to get your desired product? Perhaps worth a shot?

It appears it may be worth purchasing the 6-chloropurine as it will save headaches!

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented Jan 11, 2018

Using one equiv of n-BuLi will simply remove the N-H, using 2 equiv may help but when trying to lithiate indoles use a 2-step process. Bergman, J.; Venemalm, L. (1992). "Efficient synthesis of 2-chloro-, 2-bromo-, and 2-iodoindole". J. Org. Chem. 57 (8): 2495.

@mbhebhe
Copy link
Author

mbhebhe commented Jan 12, 2018

@MFernflower I thought methyllithium was less reactive than n-BuLi. I will try and use the chloropurine I have and if that fails I will buy some. Its so cheap too, don't know how I over looked that!
I think I will try @drc007 suggestion, I will use n-BuLi for the two step process instead of n-BuLi and tert-BuLi. I wonder if this will brominate at the 6th position on the pyrrole instead of the 7th position

@mcoster
Copy link

mcoster commented Jan 12, 2018

Yep, that's right, MeLi is less reactive than n-BuLi. Reactivity generally increases with substitution at the metallated position.

@MFernflower
Copy link
Contributor

@mcoster Why is that? - I would have thought that the less stuff hanging off the metal would allow it to do it's job better? Unless the alkyl group needs to be repulsed by something for the reaction to work?? If so perhaps try Hexyllithium ?

@drc007
Copy link

drc007 commented Jan 12, 2018

@MFernflower Hexyllithium has a similar pKa to n-BuLi (approx 50), increased alkyl substitution e.g. t-BuLi gives increased basicity (approx 53). Link http://www.uwindsor.ca/people/jgreen/sites/uwindsor.ca.people.jgreen/files/pka_bases.pdf

@mbhebhe
Copy link
Author

mbhebhe commented Mar 23, 2018

I purchased pure 6-chloropurine and currently trying to brominate with NBS.
If this doesn't work I will have use use titrated n-BuLi and bromine to brominate to make the MNB18
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants