Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Background Questions about the "Hetero-Oxadiazole" #453

Closed
audreyjallen1 opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Background Questions about the "Hetero-Oxadiazole" #453

audreyjallen1 opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@audreyjallen1
Copy link

We think that oxadiazole moiety is being used as an isostere for triazole which was previously shown to be inactive, and that triazole was used as an isostere for amide to improve (lower) lipophilicity. Is our analysis here correct? Why was amide initially looked at?

Also, why does the hetero oxadiazole have no fluorines on the aromatic ring on the left side of the molecule? We think it could just be to improve synthesis ease, but is there something else?

Thanks so much - GitHub has been of tremendous use to us!

@mattodd
Copy link
Member

mattodd commented Oct 25, 2016

The oxadiazole is being used as an isostere for an amide, sure - these compounds were a big part of the original inherited dataset for the series.
Fluorines - we're pretty sure we understand that these help potency. But analogs with those Fs there are typically more expensive to make (just in terms of the S/M cost). So if we're making new compounds it's sometimes easier to target the non-F compounds, and then when we have established the chemical methodology we can always go back and make the fluorinated versions if the compounds show promise.

@mattodd
Copy link
Member

mattodd commented Nov 16, 2016

Link installed in DCNYS section of wiki, and synthesis of this compound now taken on to #463.
Closing.

@mattodd mattodd closed this as completed Nov 16, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants