You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On the loss exceedance curves, there’s two “$” and also it seems strange to call it “0.49 million” instead of “490 thousand” especially when the horizontal axis is in thousands.
Also, it’s low priority but if it’s super easy to change could we make the outline of the postal code area black instead of red? It’s really hard to see in this map, for example.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
anthonyfok
changed the title
[ISSUE 5] Dollar figure on Loss Exceedence Curve; Colour of postal code area
[ISSUE 5] $ figures on Loss Exceedence Curve; Colour of postal code area
Oct 17, 2022
anthonyfok
changed the title
[ISSUE 5] $ figures on Loss Exceedence Curve; Colour of postal code area
[ISSUE 5] Dollar figures on Loss Exceedence Curve; Colour of postal code area
Oct 17, 2022
@tieganh wrote on Thu 2022-10-13 evening:
On the loss exceedance curves, there’s two “$” and also it seems strange to call it “0.49 million” instead of “490 thousand” especially when the horizontal axis is in thousands.
Also, it’s low priority but if it’s super easy to change could we make the outline of the postal code area black instead of red? It’s really hard to see in this map, for example.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: