Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BMC and hybrid journals until 2015 #71

Open
adrsik opened this issue Feb 1, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

BMC and hybrid journals until 2015 #71

adrsik opened this issue Feb 1, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@adrsik
Copy link
Contributor

adrsik commented Feb 1, 2016

Since 2015 BioMed Central no longer requires a subscription to access additional content (reviews and other permium contenct (commentaries, correspondence, meeting reports, ...) of the following journals:

  • Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Arthritis Research & Therapy
  • Breast Cancer Research
  • Critical Care
  • Genome Medicine
  • Genome Biology
  • Stem Cell Research & Therapy

So all articles of these journals published before 2015 should be hybrid.
I noticed several examples in the data set those who are not marked as a hybrid article.
Is there a special reason?

@tullney
Copy link
Member

tullney commented Feb 1, 2016

@adrsik , I tend to agree. The journals in questions required subscriptions to access particular sections of the journal - so they weren't hybrid in the usual way of pay-per-article hybrid APC, but they weren't full open access journals as in "every article in this journal is open access".

We could compile a list of these articles and change their status to hybrid, but maybe also talk to the institution that provided that data.

@cbroschinski
Copy link
Member

I have just compiled an overview of the journals in question (table is already filtered to those entries where is_hybrid is still FALSE):

journal_full_title occurence
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 0
Arthritis Research & Therapy 5
Breast Cancer Research 1
Critical Care 17
Genome Biology 4
Genome Medicine 1
Stem Cell Research & Therapy 3

So we are only talking about 31 entries in the whole dataset we would have to modify. Does not seem like a big deal to me.

@tullney
Copy link
Member

tullney commented Feb 1, 2016

If you added institution to your query, we'd also have a list of people to notify about changes in the data they submitted.

I am still in favour of doing this, but we should probably add a note to the wiki explaining that is_hybrid refers to the journal - not the individual article. Still it might be controversial. People investigating APCs in full open access journals and in 'hybrid' journals might disagree with framing these journals as hybrid.

Maybe leave this issue open for discussion for a few more days?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants