-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 673
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Crypto appendix - mention missing mechanisms #2380
Comments
We love PR's btw ;) #justsaying |
Yes, I thought it would be better to have this discussed before PR but this could directly be discussed in a PR instead… |
That (agreement in an issue first) is the correct procedure. |
@randomstuff I'd love your help making these please, if you have time? |
@danielcuthbert, OK, I'll try to do that. I think I'd start by including all the things I've mentioned except maybe ARIA and Camellia which appears to quite niche in term of usage but I'm open to any feedback on this. |
Some additional things not mentioned which might be relevant. MAC:
Public-key encryption:
@danielcuthbert, do you agree it makes sense to mention these? |
The following mechanisms are not mentioned and may (?) be missing.
Stream ciphers:
Block ciphers (found in the recommended TLS ciphersuites, are they used in practice?):
→ I did not find much usage of these two. Browsers don't advertise them in TLS ciphersuites for example. We can probably skip mentioning them for now.
Hash:
Key Exchange:
Moreover (and for better PQC compliance), I would remove:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: