Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Section 10 seems more mobile than web #1383

Closed
jmanico opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Section 10 seems more mobile than web #1383

jmanico opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
@jmanico @danielcuthbert @tghosth @elarlang
Labels
4b Major-rework These issues need to be part of a full chapter rework Community wanted We would like feedback from the community to guide our decision otherwise we will progress Leaders decision Big decisions, like re-structuring or concept changes V10 _5.0 - prep This needs to be addressed to prepare 5.0

Comments

@jmanico
Copy link
Member

jmanico commented Sep 28, 2022 •
edited
Loading

From: https://github.com/OWASP/ASVS/blob/master/5.0/en/0x18-V10-Malicious.md

All of section v10 seems way more mobile than web and should be discarded.

The first item of 10 is already submitted as a problematic issue here #1200

...and the rest of 10 seems very mobile-specific and should possibly be revisited.
@danielcuthbert
Copy link
Collaborator

I've never liked this sentence

"Does not have back doors, Easter eggs, salami attacks, rootkits, or unauthorized code that can be controlled by an attacker"
As someone who's written many a backdoor/malicious code, it's not exactly obvious and this is ambiguous at best.

@tghosth tghosth added 1) Discussion ongoing Issue is opened and assigned but no clear proposal yet _5.0 - prep This needs to be addressed to prepare 5.0 Community wanted We would like feedback from the community to guide our decision otherwise we will progress Leaders decision Big decisions, like re-structuring or concept changes labels Dec 7, 2022
@tghosth
Copy link
Collaborator

tghosth commented Dec 7, 2022

Agree that there are a lot of tricky points in this section, I think we need to discuss what stays if anything from this section

This was referenced Dec 21, 2022
Closed
Closed
@elarlang elarlang mentioned this issue May 23, 2023
Closed
@tghosth tghosth added 4b Major-rework These issues need to be part of a full chapter rework V10 and removed 1) Discussion ongoing Issue is opened and assigned but no clear proposal yet labels Jul 10, 2023
@elarlang elarlang mentioned this issue Sep 26, 2023
Closed
@ImanSharaf
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmanico Could you please let us know which items are specific to mobile apps and not web apps?

@elarlang
Copy link
Collaborator

I think this issues does not have any precise "problem to solve" or "proposal" in it, so I close it out.

V10 needs re-build, the starting point is probably: #1468

@elarlang elarlang closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jmanico jmanico

@danielcuthbert danielcuthbert

@tghosth tghosth

@elarlang elarlang

Labels
4b Major-rework These issues need to be part of a full chapter rework Community wanted We would like feedback from the community to guide our decision otherwise we will progress Leaders decision Big decisions, like re-structuring or concept changes V10 _5.0 - prep This needs to be addressed to prepare 5.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@jmanico @danielcuthbert @tghosth @elarlang @ImanSharaf