Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[BOT] post-merge updates
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
OCA-git-bot committed Nov 26, 2024
1 parent 9e1bdbd commit dee43e0
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 79 additions and 83 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ addon | version | maintainers | summary
[base_search_custom_field_filter](base_search_custom_field_filter/) | 17.0.1.0.0 | [![pedrobaeza](https://github.com/pedrobaeza.png?size=30px)](https://github.com/pedrobaeza) | Add custom filters for fields via UI
[base_substate](base_substate/) | 17.0.1.0.0 | | Base Sub State
[base_technical_features](base_technical_features/) | 17.0.1.0.1 | | Access to technical features without activating debug mode
[base_tier_validation](base_tier_validation/) | 17.0.2.2.1 | [![LoisRForgeFlow](https://github.com/LoisRForgeFlow.png?size=30px)](https://github.com/LoisRForgeFlow) | Implement a validation process based on tiers.
[base_tier_validation](base_tier_validation/) | 17.0.2.3.0 | [![LoisRForgeFlow](https://github.com/LoisRForgeFlow.png?size=30px)](https://github.com/LoisRForgeFlow) | Implement a validation process based on tiers.
[base_tier_validation_formula](base_tier_validation_formula/) | 17.0.1.0.0 | | Formulas for Base tier validation
[base_tier_validation_forward](base_tier_validation_forward/) | 17.0.1.0.0 | [![kittiu](https://github.com/kittiu.png?size=30px)](https://github.com/kittiu) | Forward option for base tiers
[date_range](date_range/) | 17.0.1.2.1 | [![lmignon](https://github.com/lmignon.png?size=30px)](https://github.com/lmignon) | Manage all kind of date range
Expand Down
134 changes: 66 additions & 68 deletions base_tier_validation/README.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Base Tier Validation
!! This file is generated by oca-gen-addon-readme !!
!! changes will be overwritten. !!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!! source digest: sha256:e0956b4261f41c7dbafeb78d2e0502dfaa3c83de1731a01709ebf9e1dbd142a1
!! source digest: sha256:9d45fb0cb0dd64489508d2963bbd948c59b466f16618469b6e86e3d606511aeb
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
.. |badge1| image:: https://img.shields.io/badge/maturity-Mature-brightgreen.png
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -66,16 +66,16 @@ To configure this module, you need to:

**Note:**

- If check *Notify Reviewers on Creation*, all possible reviewers will
be notified by email when this definition is triggered.
- If check *Notify reviewers on reaching pending* if you want to send a
notification when pending status is reached. This is usefull in a
approve by sequence scenario to only notify reviewers when it is
their turn in the sequence.
- If check *Comment*, reviewers can comment after click Validate or
Reject.
- If check *Approve by sequence*, reviewers is forced to review by
specified sequence.
- If check *Notify Reviewers on Creation*, all possible reviewers will
be notified by email when this definition is triggered.
- If check *Notify reviewers on reaching pending* if you want to send a
notification when pending status is reached. This is usefull in a
approve by sequence scenario to only notify reviewers when it is their
turn in the sequence.
- If check *Comment*, reviewers can comment after click Validate or
Reject.
- If check *Approve by sequence*, reviewers is forced to review by
specified sequence.

To configure Tier Validation Exceptions, you need to:

Expand All @@ -90,42 +90,40 @@ To configure Tier Validation Exceptions, you need to:

**Note:**

- If you don't create any exception, the Validated record will be
readonly and cannot be modified.
- If check *Write under Validation*, records will be able to be
modified only in the defined fields when the Validation process is
ongoing.
- If check *Write after Validation*, records will be able to be
modified only in the defined fields when the Validation process is
finished.
- If check *Write after Validation* and *Write under Validation*,
records will be able to be modified defined fields always.
- If you don't create any exception, the Validated record will be
readonly and cannot be modified.
- If check *Write under Validation*, records will be able to be modified
only in the defined fields when the Validation process is ongoing.
- If check *Write after Validation*, records will be able to be modified
only in the defined fields when the Validation process is finished.
- If check *Write after Validation* and *Write under Validation*,
records will be able to be modified defined fields always.

Known issues / Roadmap
======================

This is the list of known issues for this module. Any proposal for
improvement will be very valuable.

- **Issue:**
- **Issue:**

When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can
be inconsistencies in the systray notifications.
When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can be
inconsistencies in the systray notifications.

**Description:**
**Description:**

Field can_review in tier.review is used to filter out, in the systray
notifications, the reviews a user can approve. This can_review field
is updated **in the database** in method review_user_count, this can
make it very inconsistent for databases with a lot of users and
recurring updates that can change the expected behavior.
Field can_review in tier.review is used to filter out, in the systray
notifications, the reviews a user can approve. This can_review field
is updated **in the database** in method review_user_count, this can
make it very inconsistent for databases with a lot of users and
recurring updates that can change the expected behavior.

- **Migration to 15.0:**
- **Migration to 15.0:**

The parameter \_tier_validation_manual_config will become False, on
14.0, the default value is True, as the change is applied after the
migration. In order to use the new behavior we need to modify the
value on our expected model.
The parameter \_tier_validation_manual_config will become False, on
14.0, the default value is True, as the change is applied after the
migration. In order to use the new behavior we need to modify the
value on our expected model.

Changelog
=========
Expand All @@ -147,69 +145,69 @@ Migrated to Odoo 14.

Fixes:

- When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can
be inconsistencies in the systray notifications
- When using approve_sequence, still not approve only the needed
sequence, but also other sequence for the same approver
- When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can be
inconsistencies in the systray notifications
- When using approve_sequence, still not approve only the needed
sequence, but also other sequence for the same approver

12.0.3.3.1 (2019-12-02)
-----------------------

Fixes:

- Show comment on Reviews Table.
- Edit notification with approve_sequence.
- Show comment on Reviews Table.
- Edit notification with approve_sequence.

12.0.3.3.0 (2019-11-27)
-----------------------

New features:

- Add comment on Reviews Table.
- Approve by sequence.
- Add comment on Reviews Table.
- Approve by sequence.

12.0.3.2.1 (2019-11-26)
-----------------------

Fixes:

- Remove message_subscribe_users
- Remove message_subscribe_users

12.0.3.2.0 (2019-11-25)
-----------------------

New features:

- Notify reviewers
- Notify reviewers

12.0.3.1.0 (2019-07-08)
-----------------------

Fixes:

- Singleton error
- Singleton error

12.0.3.0.0 (2019-12-02)
-----------------------

Fixes:

- Edit Reviews Table
- Edit Reviews Table

12.0.2.1.0 (2019-05-29)
-----------------------

Fixes:

- Edit drop-down style width and position
- Edit drop-down style width and position

12.0.2.0.0 (2019-05-28)
-----------------------

New features:

- Pass parameters as functions.
- Add Systray.
- Pass parameters as functions.
- Add Systray.

12.0.1.0.0 (2019-02-18)
-----------------------
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -252,24 +250,24 @@ Authors
Contributors
------------

- Lois Rilo <[email protected]>
- Naglis Jonaitis <[email protected]>
- Adrià Gil Sorribes <[email protected]>
- Pimolnat Suntian <[email protected]>
- Pedro Gonzalez <[email protected]>
- Kitti U. <[email protected]>
- Saran Lim. <[email protected]>
- Carlos Lopez <[email protected]>
- Javier Colmeiro <[email protected]>
- bosd
- Evan Soh <[email protected]>
- Manuel Regidor <[email protected]>
- Eduardo de Miguel <[email protected]>
- `XCG Consulting <https://xcg-consulting.fr>`__:

- Houzéfa Abbasbhay

- Stefan Rijnhart <[email protected]>
- Lois Rilo <[email protected]>
- Naglis Jonaitis <[email protected]>
- Adrià Gil Sorribes <[email protected]>
- Pimolnat Suntian <[email protected]>
- Pedro Gonzalez <[email protected]>
- Kitti U. <[email protected]>
- Saran Lim. <[email protected]>
- Carlos Lopez <[email protected]>
- Javier Colmeiro <[email protected]>
- bosd
- Evan Soh <[email protected]>
- Manuel Regidor <[email protected]>
- Eduardo de Miguel <[email protected]>
- `XCG Consulting <https://xcg-consulting.fr>`__:

- Houzéfa Abbasbhay

- Stefan Rijnhart <[email protected]>

Maintainers
-----------
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion base_tier_validation/__manifest__.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
{
"name": "Base Tier Validation",
"summary": "Implement a validation process based on tiers.",
"version": "17.0.2.2.1",
"version": "17.0.2.3.0",
"development_status": "Mature",
"maintainers": ["LoisRForgeFlow"],
"category": "Tools",
Expand Down
24 changes: 11 additions & 13 deletions base_tier_validation/static/description/index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ <h1 class="title">Base Tier Validation</h1>
!! This file is generated by oca-gen-addon-readme !!
!! changes will be overwritten. !!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!! source digest: sha256:e0956b4261f41c7dbafeb78d2e0502dfaa3c83de1731a01709ebf9e1dbd142a1
!! source digest: sha256:9d45fb0cb0dd64489508d2963bbd948c59b466f16618469b6e86e3d606511aeb
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -->
<p><a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://odoo-community.org/page/development-status"><img alt="Mature" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/maturity-Mature-brightgreen.png" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0-standalone.html"><img alt="License: AGPL-3" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/licence-AGPL--3-blue.png" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://github.com/OCA/server-ux/tree/17.0/base_tier_validation"><img alt="OCA/server-ux" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/github-OCA%2Fserver--ux-lightgray.png?logo=github" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/server-ux-17-0/server-ux-17-0-base_tier_validation"><img alt="Translate me on Weblate" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/weblate-Translate%20me-F47D42.png" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://runboat.odoo-community.org/builds?repo=OCA/server-ux&amp;target_branch=17.0"><img alt="Try me on Runboat" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/runboat-Try%20me-875A7B.png" /></a></p>
<p>Validating some operations is a common need across different areas in a
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -433,8 +433,8 @@ <h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#toc-entry-1">Configuration</a></h1>
be notified by email when this definition is triggered.</li>
<li>If check <em>Notify reviewers on reaching pending</em> if you want to send a
notification when pending status is reached. This is usefull in a
approve by sequence scenario to only notify reviewers when it is
their turn in the sequence.</li>
approve by sequence scenario to only notify reviewers when it is their
turn in the sequence.</li>
<li>If check <em>Comment</em>, reviewers can comment after click Validate or
Reject.</li>
<li>If check <em>Approve by sequence</em>, reviewers is forced to review by
Expand All @@ -455,12 +455,10 @@ <h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#toc-entry-1">Configuration</a></h1>
<ul class="simple">
<li>If you don’t create any exception, the Validated record will be
readonly and cannot be modified.</li>
<li>If check <em>Write under Validation</em>, records will be able to be
modified only in the defined fields when the Validation process is
ongoing.</li>
<li>If check <em>Write after Validation</em>, records will be able to be
modified only in the defined fields when the Validation process is
finished.</li>
<li>If check <em>Write under Validation</em>, records will be able to be modified
only in the defined fields when the Validation process is ongoing.</li>
<li>If check <em>Write after Validation</em>, records will be able to be modified
only in the defined fields when the Validation process is finished.</li>
<li>If check <em>Write after Validation</em> and <em>Write under Validation</em>,
records will be able to be modified defined fields always.</li>
</ul>
Expand All @@ -471,8 +469,8 @@ <h1><a class="toc-backref" href="#toc-entry-2">Known issues / Roadmap</a></h1>
improvement will be very valuable.</p>
<ul>
<li><p class="first"><strong>Issue:</strong></p>
<p>When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can
be inconsistencies in the systray notifications.</p>
<p>When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can be
inconsistencies in the systray notifications.</p>
<p><strong>Description:</strong></p>
<p>Field can_review in tier.review is used to filter out, in the systray
notifications, the reviews a user can approve. This can_review field
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -504,8 +502,8 @@ <h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#toc-entry-5">14.0.1.0.0 (2020-11-19)</a></h2>
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#toc-entry-6">13.0.1.2.2 (2020-08-30)</a></h2>
<p>Fixes:</p>
<ul class="simple">
<li>When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can
be inconsistencies in the systray notifications</li>
<li>When using approve_sequence option in any tier.definition there can be
inconsistencies in the systray notifications</li>
<li>When using approve_sequence, still not approve only the needed
sequence, but also other sequence for the same approver</li>
</ul>
Expand Down

0 comments on commit dee43e0

Please sign in to comment.