You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here the documentation mentions Granger causality is implemented with historical exogenous variables, but I could not find in the source code where this happens. I am in the process of scoping a project including additional exog variables and I'm concerned this is not implemented yet . I'm looking to validate that historic exog variables utilize GC as described. Could you help me identify where this takes place? Thanks!
Link
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello! We're just saying that the validity and predictive power of historic exogenous features relies on Granger-causality. There is no deep learning architecture explicitly verifying Granger-causality. Ultimately, you can let the model find the best features combination to get the best forecast possible.
Description
Here the documentation mentions Granger causality is implemented with historical exogenous variables, but I could not find in the source code where this happens. I am in the process of scoping a project including additional exog variables and I'm concerned this is not implemented yet . I'm looking to validate that historic exog variables utilize GC as described. Could you help me identify where this takes place? Thanks!
Link
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: