Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[neuralforecast] - Where is Granger Causality Implemented? #1257

Closed
webert6 opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

[neuralforecast] - Where is Granger Causality Implemented? #1257

webert6 opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@webert6
Copy link

webert6 commented Jan 27, 2025

Description

Here the documentation mentions Granger causality is implemented with historical exogenous variables, but I could not find in the source code where this happens. I am in the process of scoping a project including additional exog variables and I'm concerned this is not implemented yet . I'm looking to validate that historic exog variables utilize GC as described. Could you help me identify where this takes place? Thanks!

Link

No response

@marcopeix marcopeix self-assigned this Jan 27, 2025
@marcopeix
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! We're just saying that the validity and predictive power of historic exogenous features relies on Granger-causality. There is no deep learning architecture explicitly verifying Granger-causality. Ultimately, you can let the model find the best features combination to get the best forecast possible.

Does that answer your question?

@webert6
Copy link
Author

webert6 commented Jan 27, 2025

Makes sense! Thanks for the clarification.

@webert6 webert6 closed this as completed Jan 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants