-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Using connman with iwd is impossible due to incorrect assertion #56125
Comments
In [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ConnMan#Using_iwd_instead_of_wpa_supplicant |
If someone ends up putting together the needed bits, please share (probably as a PR)! Ive kludged network-manager into using iwd (kludge is needed for similar assertion and to not run iwd standalone, IIRC) but I'm keen to give connman a try :). |
FYI guys, ConnMan doesn't really keep up to date with iwd and integration between the two might lead to frustration. See
The best bet for now is to use network manager with iwd (#51803) |
NetworkManager is ugly and buggy |
I've been also using iwd without network manager or connman just fine. |
I'm thinking of writing a GUI for iwd - to use iwd + dhcpcd |
Heads up for anyone interested iwd 1.0 was released with breaking changes, refs: |
Issue description
connman built with iwd: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/tools/networking/connman/default.nix#L47
But module contains assertion that returns error when wpa_supplicant is disabled (enabling iwd disables wpa_supplicant):
nixpkgs/nixos/modules/services/networking/connman.nix
Line 76 in 63a0988
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: