Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make citation section more prominent #152

Open
rly opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Make citation section more prominent #152

rly opened this issue Apr 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rly
Copy link
Contributor

rly commented Apr 10, 2024

Currently information about citing NWB is under FAQ: https://nwb-overview.readthedocs.io/en/latest/faq.html#how-do-i-cite-nwb-2-in-my-research

You have to be looking for it to find it. It would be nice to put this up-front, so that when people start to use NWB, particularly when writing data, they already have a seed planted in their mind that they should cite NWB in their paper to give the team academic credit.

See how "Citing BIDS" is a subsection of the Introduction to BIDS: https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/introduction.html

It might be a bit much to put it at the bottom of the short "Intro to NWB" page. But maybe it could be Section 7 of "Converting neurophysiology data to NWB"?

@oruebel
Copy link
Contributor

oruebel commented Apr 11, 2024

Maybe this is something that should be part of nwb.org? We have it on https://www.nwb.org/publications/ but maybe we can make a separate page on "Citing NWB" and have it in the "About" menu.

@stephprince stephprince added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants