Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
45 lines (30 loc) · 2.98 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

45 lines (30 loc) · 2.98 KB
Raw

Project Title: Economic Viability of Solar Panels vs. Generators for High Load GPU Bitcoin Mining in South Africa

Project Overview

This project evaluates the economic viability of implementing solar panels versus generators for a high load GPU Bitcoin mining corporation, Cryptohub (Pty) Ltd, based in South Africa. The analysis incorporates financial analysis, microeconomic, and macroeconomic perspectives to determine the most cost-effective and sustainable energy solution.

Distinction and Recognition

The project received a distinction and was supported by my previous experience in accounting, highlighted by my achievement of placing in the top 10 of a national accounting Olympiad in Grade 12.

Methodology

  1. Data Collection: Gathered data on the cost of solar panels and generators, including installation, maintenance, and operational costs.
  2. Financial Analysis: Conducted a detailed financial analysis using net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and payback period calculations.
  3. Microeconomic Analysis: Evaluated the impact of supply and demand for energy resources, cost of materials, and labor market conditions.
  4. Macroeconomic Analysis: Analyzed government policies, subsidies for renewable energy, economic stability, and inflation rates in South Africa.
  5. Environmental Impact Assessment: Compared the carbon footprint and sustainability of solar panels versus generators.

Key Findings:

Solar System

  • Cost Savings: Solar power can reduce electricity costs during non-load-shedding periods, saving R607,919.90 per year.
  • Net Cash Flow: The net cash flow for the first year is R2,457,920, steadily increasing each year.
  • Payback Period: The initial investment can be recouped in 3 years.
  • NPV: The net present value is R476,289, indicating profitability.
  • IRR: The internal rate of return is 19%, exceeding the required rate of return of 16.5%.

Generator System

  • Cost Savings: No additional electricity cost savings during non-load-shedding periods.
  • Net Cash Flow: The net cash flow for each year is R1,800,000.
  • Payback Period: The initial investment can be recovered in 3.33 years.
  • NPV: The net present value is -R174,364, indicating unprofitability.
  • IRR: The internal rate of return is 15%, below the required rate of return of 16.5%.

Financing

  • Structured Loan Agreement: To finance the purchase without diluting shareholder equity.
  • Liquidity and Solvency: The business is solvent but has liquidity concerns, which can be managed with a structured loan over a 5-year period.

Conclusions

  • Solar System: Recommended due to higher net cash flow, shorter payback period, positive NPV, and higher IRR. It is also more environmentally and socially sustainable.
  • Financing: A 5-year loan repayment plan is recommended to improve cash liquidity and match the 5-year forecast.