Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add an xfail test for Parquet reads for LIST<STRUCT<int, string>> #8708

Closed
Tracked by #8666
razajafri opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #8666

Add an xfail test for Parquet reads for LIST<STRUCT<int, string>> #8708

razajafri opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jlowe
Labels
task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing test Only impacts tests

Comments

@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator

razajafri commented Jul 13, 2023 •
edited
Loading

This is related to a corresponding issue in cudf where the reader isn't reading a list of structs properly. Please refer to rapidsai/cudf#13664 for more details

This is a known issue and the test will fail which is why we are xfailing it
@razajafri razajafri mentioned this issue Jul 13, 2023
Open
47 tasks
@razajafri razajafri changed the title Parquet reads for LIST<STRUCT<int, string>>: (Refer to https://github.com/rapidsai/cudf/issues/13664) Parquet reads for LIST<STRUCT<int, string>> fail Jul 13, 2023
@razajafri razajafri changed the title Parquet reads for LIST<STRUCT<int, string>> fail Add an xfail test for Parquet reads for LIST<STRUCT<int, string>> Jul 13, 2023
@razajafri razajafri mentioned this issue Jul 13, 2023
Closed
@razajafri razajafri self-assigned this Jul 13, 2023
@razajafri razajafri added test Only impacts tests task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing labels Jul 13, 2023
@jlowe
Copy link
Contributor

jlowe commented Jul 14, 2023

This is covered by #8646.

@razajafri razajafri assigned jlowe and unassigned razajafri Jul 14, 2023
@razajafri razajafri mentioned this issue Jul 14, 2023
Merged
@jlowe jlowe closed this as completed Jul 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jlowe jlowe

Labels
task Work required that improves the product but is not user facing test Only impacts tests
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add a test for reading a repeated_no_annotation Parquet file razajafri/spark-rapids
2 participants
@jlowe @razajafri