[BUG]: nvrtc Excessive error pragma for --expt-relaxed-constexpr

[kroburg]

Is this a duplicate?

• I confirmed there appear to be no duplicate issues for this bug (https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuCollections/issues)

Type of Bug

Compile-time Error

Describe the bug

Hello.

I'm trying to use cuco with nvrtc. And it fails with error

catastrophic error: #error directive: "Support for relaxed constexpr is required (nvcc flag --expt-relaxed-constexpr)"
  #error "Support for relaxed constexpr is required (nvcc flag --expt-relaxed-constexpr)"

Please consider thread from jitify. Looks like it is not required for nvrtc.

I'm not sure if I can have success with nvrtc anyway.
I have to include cuco/static_map.cuh to compose static_map_ref for kernel params like that: decltype(((const map_t*)nullptr)->ref(cuco::find));
This is because I don't known how to craft StorageRef template argument.

From my expirience including such a "wide" header as cuco/static_map.cuh will not work with nvrtc because of host api calls.

How to Reproduce

NA

Expected behavior

cuco compiles using nvrtc.

Reproduction link

No response

Operating System

No response

nvidia-smi output

No response

NVCC version

NA

[kroburg]

Well, I got it. It will not work anyway :-/

/tmp/sis_cuda_package.tmp.0caa4e15e025276df64cd21d90ac80e4/cccl/thrust/thrust/detail/execute_with_dependencies.h(63): error: A function explicitly marked as a __host__ function is not allowed in JIT mode
    _CCCL_HOST execute_with_dependencies(super_t const& super, Dependencies&&... deps)

           ^

[PointKernel]

#595 improves the situation by disabling the relaxed constexpr requirements in cuco

[kroburg]

Great! Thank you.

[PointKernel]

Closing as resolved