Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The new suite FV3_GFS_v16b_ugwpv1 for GFSv16b-127L/C96 to work on issue #347 in ufs-weather-model #222

Closed
ValeryYudin-NOAA opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ValeryYudin-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The new CCPP suite FV3_GFS_v16b_ugwpv1 and regression tests for warm_start and cold_starts
with GFSv16b (low resolution, C96_L127). The new suite represents the upgrade of uGWP (V1),CU-CIRES. It is capable to reproduce the realistic FV3GFS climate, including equatorial dynamics (QBO and SAO, 20-60 km)) and annual cycles in the extra-tropics and polar regions in the upper atmsosphere (20-80km). It can be executed and tested with the gsldrag sub-grid scale orography physics of gsl/develop for UFS-R2O planned activity in 2021.

Solution

Under FV3/ccpp
a) add corresponding suite
FV3/ccpp/suites/suite_FV3_GFS_v16b_ugwpv1.xml
and
b) modify FV3/ccpp/config/ccpp_prebuild_config.py
Under FV3/gfsphysics/GFS_layer:
modify GFS_typedefs.F90 GFS_typedefs.meta

Alternatives

N/A

Testing:

  1. Have you tested the code changes? On what platforms?
    Hera/Intel
  2. Have you run regression test in ufs-weather-model or ufs-s2s-model with code changes? -Yes in ufs-werather-model
  • Will the baseline results change -Yes
  • If yes, please give brief explanation
    The physically-motivated RT tests for warm and cold starts of UFS-127L/C96 have been created that corresponds
    to the low-resolution runs of GFSv16

Dependent PR/Issues:

NCAR/ccpp-physics #issue 542
ufs-weather-model: #issue 347

@climbfuji
Copy link
Collaborator

Closed via #241.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants