Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Parameters Inbound #753

Closed
rgknox opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 8 comments
Closed

New Parameters Inbound #753

rgknox opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 8 comments

Comments

@rgknox
Copy link
Contributor

rgknox commented Jun 21, 2021

There are few new parameters that are imminent.

See the following PRs:

#752

  • scalar: ED_val_vai_top_bin_width
  • scalar: ED_val_vai_width_increase_factor

#724

  • Leaf photosynthetic temperature acclimation timescale

#738
real(r8), allocatable :: allom_dbh_max(:)
real(r8), allocatable :: allom_dbh_0(:)
real(r8), allocatable :: allom_zfr_max(:)
real(r8), allocatable :: allom_zfr_0(:)
real(r8), allocatable :: allom_frk(:)

#737
real(r8), allocatable :: hydr_alpha_vg(:) ! capilary length parameter in van Genuchten model
real(r8), allocatable :: hydr_m_vg(:) ! pore size distribution, m in van Genuchten 1980 model range (0,1)
real(r8), allocatable :: hydr_n_vg(:) ! pore size distribution, n in van Genuchten 1980 model range >2
real(r8), allocatable :: hydr_k_lwp(:) ! inner leaf humidity scaling coefficient

#736
real(r8), allocatable :: hydr_k_lwp(:) ! inner leaf humidity scaling coefficient

#703
real(r8), allocatable :: hlm_pft_map(:,:) ! Mapping from HLM PFTs to FATES PFTs in fixed biogeog mode.

It would be nice to consolidate these into one PR to help people with updating their code. I will work with authors to finalize the list of parameters. Will roll this out before the referenced PRs (except for SP, if SP is ready first, I think we should just let SP do its thing)

@ckoven
@JunyanDing
@rgknox
@rosiealice
@glemieux

@ckoven
Copy link
Contributor

ckoven commented Jun 22, 2021

As we will want to update the leaf maintenance respiration model shortly to also allow acclimation (PR #729), we should at a minimum figure out what the parameters for that will be and include them as well here. Also which of these updates will require switches to turn on or off? I imagine at a minimum, a switch to choose acclimating/non-acclimating photosynthesis for #724, a switch to turn on/off the size-dependent rooting depth for #738, anything else?

@rgknox
Copy link
Contributor Author

rgknox commented Jun 22, 2021

As an option, for the acclimation timescale, -1 or 0 could be a special value flagging that its not used.

For the rooting depths, by setting the dbh at maximum rooting depth to zero and the maximum rooting depth to the bottom of the soil column it should force cohorts to always have deep roots (current hypothesis).

@ckoven
Copy link
Contributor

ckoven commented Jun 24, 2021

let's fix a typo in the parameter file too:
https://github.com/NGEET/fates/blob/master/parameter_files/fates_params_default.cdl#L1009

there is a 2 in the fates_maintresp_reduction_intercept field that shouldn't be there...

@rgknox
Copy link
Contributor Author

rgknox commented Jun 25, 2021

As part of #737, I'm going to add a parameter switch that allows the user to option between Van Genuchten and TFS types of pressure-volume and pressure-conductivity curves. "hydr_pvpk_mode" 1=TFS, 2=VG

Would anyone like this switch dimensioned by plant organ? For instance, this would allow a user to specify VG for xylem tissues and TFS for leaf tissues, or any combination they desire. My sense is that perhaps this is over-complicated, but wanted to get people's opinions.
@JunyanDing
@xuchongang
@pnlfang
@pollybuotte
@tompowell9
@bchristo

Also, we have the following naming convention for some tfs specific parameters: "hydr_avuln_node". I think it would be nice to suffix these with "_tfs", for instance: "hydr_avuln_tfs". This way the user can quickly identify which parameters are relevant depending on the PV/PK model they are using. The downside is that people have to make more modifications to their existing parameter files to keep them compatible (although they will have to make modifications anyway).

@JunyanDing
Copy link
Contributor

@rgknox I like this option. I think TFS is better for leaf while VG is better for xylem. Thanks.

@rgknox
Copy link
Contributor Author

rgknox commented Jun 25, 2021

edit of previous post: Stomatal conductance has its own and separate parameters from those that govern pressure-conductivity in the plant organs. We currently only have one hypothesis (TFS) that regulates stomatal conductance from leaf-water-potential. The current proposal will not change that.

@rgknox rgknox mentioned this issue Jun 25, 2021
3 tasks
@rgknox
Copy link
Contributor Author

rgknox commented Jun 25, 2021

The PR can be found here: #759

@rgknox
Copy link
Contributor Author

rgknox commented Jul 23, 2021

Parameters added via #759

@rgknox rgknox closed this as completed Jul 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants