You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Transferring the @slevis-lmwg comments here for future discussion:
@glemieux and I discussed the risk of using the same three file names (states, transitions, management) for all cases that are present in /glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/inputdata/lnd/clm2/rawdata/LUH2. The most likely risk that comes to mind is one where we copy or move files without keeping track of the contents. We looked in a few files for metadata that may help differentiate between files but did not find enough information.
@glemieux and I recommend renaming the files according to case/scenario/version/other identifying characteristics. Doing so requires modifications to the tool, but maybe just in these few lines?
I suggested that @glemieux move forward without changing the file names for now. When the tool gets added to Erik's mksurfdata_esmf makefile, we can determine whether changing the file names adds significant complication. We may also decide to keep the file names unchanged in order to maintain "purity" relative to the original source of the data on the LUH2 website.
This discussion was converted from issue #1057 on August 01, 2023 22:27.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Transferring the @slevis-lmwg comments here for future discussion:
Originally posted by @slevis-lmwg in #1032 (comment)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions