switch to math jax?

[rgknox]

I vaguely recall that math jax might provide crisper equations, this option is available in our documentation build system. Perhaps we should change to it.

[rgknox]

I just happened to be looking at this biogeosciences ref by Martinez-Cano et al., and I noticed they had an optional MathJax method of rendering the equations:

https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/16/847/2019/

I thought the mathjax really looked much nicer, it would be nice to give it a try here

[wwieder]

@olyson, maybe we can try something similar with the CLM documentation?

[olyson]

No idea how to do this right now, but maybe we can bring it up at a software meeting.

[glemieux]

We will likely need a requirements.txt file to specify the mathjax package to use, which fates-docs currently does not have. See fates-users-guide for example.

[glemieux]

Note that @adamhb tested out mathjax locally on his setup with success per #57 (comment). His PR #57 has a commit with the config update including mathjax that is commented out. We should try and enable this in a future PR.

[glemieux]

Closing per #66