We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As built-in projects increase, we need a logical naming rule to help with looking up projects:
An idea here is to go: ROU/BU: Name, Scale
ROU/BU:
Name,
Scale
Examples: REG_BC: CMC, 1KM REG_QC: Pilot 1, 1KM REG_NB: Province Wide, 10HA PGAP: Focal Area 1, 1KM PGAP: Focal Area 1, 10HA REG_AB: Aspen Parkland Boreal Fringe, 1KM CPP: ERAP Example 1, 1KM
And for projects that don't fall into a ROU or BU, we could go: EXTERNAL: Calgary Zoo, 1KM ECOREGION: Keller Lake Plain, 1KM
That way, projects will list alphabetically, and scrolling and selecting a project will be easier.
@ricschuster @edwardsmarc, wondering if you are good with this naming style? Or if you think it should be tweaked.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Have all the "built-in" projects with the new namming rule:
I think it is best to left-align the drop down so its even easier to select. Currently everything is centered.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
As built-in projects increase, we need a logical naming rule to help with looking up projects:
An idea here is to go:
ROU/BU:
Name,
Scale
Examples:
REG_BC: CMC, 1KM
REG_QC: Pilot 1, 1KM
REG_NB: Province Wide, 10HA
PGAP: Focal Area 1, 1KM
PGAP: Focal Area 1, 10HA
REG_AB: Aspen Parkland Boreal Fringe, 1KM
CPP: ERAP Example 1, 1KM
And for projects that don't fall into a ROU or BU, we could go:
EXTERNAL: Calgary Zoo, 1KM
ECOREGION: Keller Lake Plain, 1KM
That way, projects will list alphabetically, and scrolling and selecting a project will be easier.
@ricschuster @edwardsmarc, wondering if you are good with this naming style? Or if you think it should be tweaked.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: