-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
q parameter does not work on members end-point #197
Comments
For this ticket, focus on /products/{id}/members... since the /classes/{class}/{id}/memebers... are now deprecated. |
@jordanpadams can you confirm that this behaviour is a requirement? (Only asking since Thomas mentioned that it's unclear) |
@alexdunnjpl I think we want to support |
@jordanpadams after digging through the relevant code and running it by @al-niessner, the short answer to "why wouldn't we" is "because the raw query q= is intended as a way to expose a low-level interface for custom querying, and the architecture isn't designed to support combination in the necessary fashion". An alternative approach to provide similar functionality is to extend the query language to include operators for references (ex. |
@al-niessner @alexdunnjpl copy. we can close this as wontfix, but I will create a new requirement to support more complex queries combining both aggregation searches with metadata searches. |
🐛 Describe the bug
I am not sure if that is intended to work in the first place, but in case yes,
the following request
Does not filter the results. We get the same response with request:
🕵️ Expected behavior
The filter should (To Be confirmed) apply to the members of the collection requested.
📚 Version of Software Used
1.1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: