0.19.0 rpc.discover schema or actuals bug?

[FrankC01]

Is SUI RPC TransactionResponse/TransactionEffects schema wrong or ???. Here is a snippet of TransactionEffects in schema referring to ObjectRef

        "TransactionEffects": {
          "description": "The response from processing a transaction or a certified transaction",
          "type": "object",
          "required": [
            "gasObject",
            "gasUsed",
            "status",
            "transactionDigest"
          ],
          "properties": {
            "created": {
              "type": "array",
              "items": {
                "$ref": "#/components/schemas/ObjectRef"
              }
            },

With ObjectRef in schema:

        "ObjectRef": {
          "type": "object",
          "required": [
            "digest",
            "objectId",
            "version"
          ],
          "properties": {
            "digest": {
            },
            "objectId": {
            },
            "version": {
          }
        },

However, I am getting this in the subscription data:

                    "created": [
                        {
                            "owner": {"ObjectOwner": "0x dcc4acdcbe40459d37e0ff1d5518cd38705ea905"},
                            "reference": {
# Ommitted lines
                            },
                        },

Note the presence of owner in the actual data not accounted for in the schema?
I also received wrapped effect which aligns with ObjectRef expectations

                    "wrapped": [
                        {
                            "objectId": "0x 06c5428245ae9dda32ccf96d00de1fb228b09016",
                            "version": 892630,
                            "digest": "WFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYWFhYWFg=",
                        }
                    ],
                  ```

[awelc]

@FrankC01, thank you for filing this! As confirmed by @patrickkuo, it is indeed a bug.

[FrankC01]

Hey gang... Is there a PR# for this?

[patrickkuo]

Hey gang... Is there a PR# for this?

#7232