-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PNI Product Page Improvements #3904
Comments
Becca Ricks has provided some context for the MSS categories:
cc @caltrider |
First draft of email interstitial work: https://redpen.io/p/yh131112029e4f1b2e |
Okay! So I spent way too much time in Invision playing with this but I have prototypes for review! These prototypes include:
I hope the prototype is intuitive enough for you to use ... If not, just click the page if you're not sure where things are actionable and a blue box(es) should flash. @taisdesouzalessa @kristinashu Product Page Updates! |
Because the creepometer is such an important part of how the guide is presented to the world and how the media and companies cover the guide, I feel like the desktop option #1 is by far the best. I'm not sure about the mobile options as they all seem to hide it more than I would like to see it hidden. As for moving the "what could happen" section up...I'm not sure I love it after all. I think I like the bookends of product info at the top, research in the middle, and summary at the end. My thoughts @beccaklam |
Thanks for your thoughts @caltrider! The desktop options correspond to the mobile ones. So Option 1 Mobile is what Option 1 Desktop would look like since we can't have the creep-o-meter sticky next to the content on such a small screen. |
@beccaklam first of all, amazing job on including the user testing insights on these proposals. So great to see those prototypes :). I love the solutions you proposed. My favorite is the Option 2, I think it is a good balance between having the creepometer constantly present in the page + the focus needed for such a content-heavy page. I find that in Option 1 the creepometer competes with the main content of the page. Now if you want the creepometer expanded in the page I feel option 3 may be a good solution. Because if the user misses the button they will see it at the main page and the voting system seems to be in the right spot (when users would be ready to vote after taking a look at the info we are presenting to them). Very aligned to our research insights. |
Fair point here @taisdesouzalessa . I will say that having people interact with the creepometer is a more important goal for us than having people read all the content. Keeping the creepometer front and center feels like a priority for us on these pages. |
Sweet prototypes! I love the round button on Option 2 desktop. It stands out just the right amount and looks playful and I want to click it to see what will happen. You could even animate through all the faces once and then end and stay on the question mark. But I also like how Option 3 desktop because it keeps the creep-o-meter on the page, but lower down. And I really like the Option 3 mobile version of this because the scroll down feels much less committal. I hate to say it do you think they could be Frankenstein-ed together or would that be terrible?! |
Oh and for the interstitial, I find the transparent overlay makes things really hard to read and too busy looking, any other ideas? We're talking about showing the email sign up later and less often #3943. Is that enough? |
So, a lot of updates! |
Designs are look sweet and user testing is about to start! Once testing is done we will review the results #4013 and decide what to do. I've separated this into three design tickets for next sprint: PNI product page: finalize creep-o-meter #4015 Rebecca, could you please double check them and then I think this one is good to close! |
Those tickets look good to me! Closing this, thanks @kristinashu ! |
Based on user testing conducted at MozFest, @taisdesouzalessa and I have distilled our findings into the following issues need attention on PNI's product pages:
1. Clarify "Minimum Security Standards" section
(Note: "Minimum Security Standards" is hereafter known as "MSS")
2. Our research is too low on the page and users want that information
(Note: changing creep-o-meter position may negate the following ...)
3. Users are not hitting the submit button on the creep-o-meter
4. Change email interstitial copy and opacity
4. Add labels to Recommended products
cc: @taisdesouzalessa @kristinashu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: