We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With PR#113, there is now an annotation and a summary table for each job at the end of a workflow using this action.
But when there are many jobs in a workflow, the annotation for "sccache stats" are not very understandable without job's id. See for example, this workflow for uutils/coreutils project https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/actions/runs/9549256298
uutils/coreutils
At the contrary, the job's name is present in the header of sscache stats' summary table.
@orf As author of this new feature, please could you add the job's id in the annotation for sccache stats ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
With PR#113, there is now an annotation and a summary table for each job at the end of a workflow using this action.
But when there are many jobs in a workflow, the annotation for "sccache stats" are not very understandable without job's id. See for example, this workflow for
uutils/coreutils
project https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/actions/runs/9549256298At the contrary, the job's name is present in the header of sscache stats' summary table.
@orf As author of this new feature, please could you add the job's id in the annotation for sccache stats ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: