Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release Automation #5

Closed
ashfurrow opened this issue Dec 7, 2015 · 9 comments
Closed

Release Automation #5

ashfurrow opened this issue Dec 7, 2015 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ashfurrow
Copy link
Member

There are enough libraries I touch (Moya, this, and this) that all need similar releases.

It'd be fab if I could abstract Moya's current release script so this was a lot easier.

@ashfurrow ashfurrow self-assigned this Dec 7, 2015
@mpurland
Copy link
Member

mpurland commented Dec 7, 2015

Any luck with adding github release?

@ashfurrow
Copy link
Member Author

TBH I've not had a chance to try it out yet. From your description, though, it looks like it should work!

@ashfurrow
Copy link
Member Author

Took a look, seems a bit clumsy to use, but I'm going to give it a shot.

@ashfurrow
Copy link
Member Author

So I looked into this, and Fastlane seems like the obvious answer. However, after reconstruct the existing Makefile tasks, we only save six lines of code. That's not significant enough to justify another dependency imo.

The current Rakefile is 101 lines, uses Ruby in a clever-but-obvious way, and invokes command line tools that we're already familiar with. Using the current Rakefile would be a good solution, but we still need to duplicate it in each library. That's probably not a huge deal.

So yeah, I'm thinking maybe just create a gist that contains a sort of 'template', and then link to that gist in all the Rakefiles to make it easy for other developers to reuse. Anyone else opposed?

@orta
Copy link
Member

orta commented Feb 28, 2016

Probably better off making a library releasing gem at this point

@ashfurrow
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah it's worth considering, especially if we're moving towards a common-ish way of doing things.

@orta
Copy link
Member

orta commented Mar 2, 2016

Could be done here: CocoaPods/cocoapods-plugins#52

@segiddins
Copy link

This was done via Moya/Moya#456, right?

@ashfurrow
Copy link
Member Author

@segiddins I believe so, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants