You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is for people who want to investigate the question of whether training on multiple radiology modalities results in better performance than single modality training. We want to look at what combinations of modalities work and what do not, and what is the important factors: Is it how visually similar the images are? Is it if they focus on the same region? Is it the difference in the nature of the examination method (using X-ray radiation like X-rays and CT or magnetic like MRI).
Another issue we want to investigate is whether the orientation of 3D images (sagittal vs coronal vs horizontal) effects performance when training simultaneous with 2D x-rays, since X-rays are coronal. I would imagine having all 3D images in coronal is better, but I guess we can also evaluate it empirically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue is for people who want to investigate the question of whether training on multiple radiology modalities results in better performance than single modality training. We want to look at what combinations of modalities work and what do not, and what is the important factors: Is it how visually similar the images are? Is it if they focus on the same region? Is it the difference in the nature of the examination method (using X-ray radiation like X-rays and CT or magnetic like MRI).
Another issue we want to investigate is whether the orientation of 3D images (sagittal vs coronal vs horizontal) effects performance when training simultaneous with 2D x-rays, since X-rays are coronal. I would imagine having all 3D images in coronal is better, but I guess we can also evaluate it empirically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: