The router API should allow its backend to be configurable #2942
dead-claudia
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
If I find time, I'll implement this. It's pretty straightforward. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It should be possible to configure how URLs are routed, so people aren't having to fork it for use cases like this. For comparison, it'd give us the ability to provide a hook like React Router's
history
attribute, without much work on our part.(It's come up on Gitter more than once. Marking for v2 because it's a pretty trivial change on our part.)
Here's what I propose:
$window
directly for the core router, accept a backend, and default to one that wraps$window
. Same goes for the API frontend.backend.normalize(fragment)
- Get and normalize the specified fragment.backend.setPath(prefix, path, state, title, replace)
- Set the path given certain optionsbackend.initialState()
- Get the initial state to potentially assign.backend.registerResolver(resolver)
- Register the router'sresolveRoutes
function.Basically, I don't want to require every user that needs to override the underlying routing mechanism to redo the entire router, but instead just require them to implement a few methods.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions