Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tag Parser-based Completion info is incorrect for type aliases and other stuff #2850

Closed
sean-mcmanus opened this issue Nov 22, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
bug fixed Check the Milestone for the release in which the fix is or will be available. Language Service quick fix
Milestone

Comments

@sean-mcmanus
Copy link
Contributor

using myAlias = myClass;

The completion detail info says "myAliasmyClass".

There are other lower priority cases that don't give the ideal tooltip (i.e. matching VS), e.g. "typedef int myTypedef;" shows just "int myTypedef" with the "typedef" part missing (making it look like myTypedef is an int variable).

@sean-mcmanus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, this problem doesn't repro with IntelliSense, only the Tag Parser completions.

@sean-mcmanus sean-mcmanus changed the title IntelliSense Completion info is incorrect for type aliases and other stuff Tag Parser-based Completion info is incorrect for type aliases and other stuff Dec 22, 2018
@sean-mcmanus sean-mcmanus modified the milestones: Triage, December 2018 Dec 22, 2018
@sean-mcmanus sean-mcmanus added the fixed Check the Milestone for the release in which the fix is or will be available. label Dec 22, 2018
@sean-mcmanus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed with our latest 0.21.0-insiders3. Setting C_Cpp.updateChannel to "Insiders" is another way to get the update.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 11, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug fixed Check the Milestone for the release in which the fix is or will be available. Language Service quick fix
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant