Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion] A whole load of improvements for a few different modules #2175

Open
3 tasks done
Funtimes909 opened this issue Mar 21, 2022 · 17 comments
Open
3 tasks done
Labels
enhancement New feature or request.

Comments

@Funtimes909
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the feature

Chat Highlight, Highlights certain words (can also be configured to highlight usernames) in chat with a configurable color

Auto Inventory Module, Automatically puts certain items into certain slots of your inventory

Mass TPA module (Thanks Wurst!), Sends and cancels mass TPA requests to other players online, Can also be access via /mass-tpa "username" cancel "true/false" delay in ticks "20"

Twerk Module, Auto Twerks at a configurable speed (Kinda like anti-afk but just twerking!)

Auto disable option for all auras that can be set to disable after being kicked/disconnecting or after a certain time period

You can now set a delay for Auto Respawn

Limit feature for tracers, Similar to the culling feature in the nametags module, allows you to set a strict amount of tracers that can be rendered

Auto disable option to disable spammer module after being kicked/disconnected

Combat info can now display health and armor durability in numbers or percentages

Combat info can also display item names

Blink will now render a player model with your skin where you are standing and will disappear once it is disabled

I am aware this a lot of things to add so sorry if someone of them already exist in some addons or other modules

Before submitting a suggestion

  • This feature doesn't already exist in the client.
    (I have checked every module and their settings on the latest dev build)

  • This wasn't already suggested.
    (I have checked every suggestion on github)

  • This feature is a valid suggestion.
    (I have read the FAQs and Guides)

@Funtimes909 Funtimes909 added the enhancement New feature or request. label Mar 21, 2022
@machiecodes
Copy link
Contributor

picrew pfp opinions ignored

@C10udburst
Copy link
Contributor

C10udburst commented Mar 21, 2022

why is this written like a pull request when it is not a pull request

@arlomcwalter
Copy link
Member

why is this written like a pull request when it is not a pull request

agree

@SnivyLlama
Copy link

why is this written like a pull request when it is not a pull request

ikr, they even say stuff like "you can now"

@Funtimes909
Copy link
Contributor Author

why is this written like a pull request when it is not a pull request

I was originally going to add this to my own addon and just copy pasted the ideas list into the suggestion

@SIMULATAN
Copy link
Contributor

A few great ideas, I'll look into it on the weekend if nobody else does so

@DesiCow
Copy link
Contributor

DesiCow commented Mar 27, 2022

Instead of mass tpa command, add {players.all} placeholder for Starscript.
In macros we could type tpa {players.all} for example and it will automatically parse this placeholder for all online players in server and will execute the command on all those players.

@arlomcwalter
Copy link
Member

no because parsing {players.all} would just result in like "/tpa player1 player2 player70" and wouldn't work

@SIMULATAN
Copy link
Contributor

starscript forEach when

@arlomcwalter
Copy link
Member

starscript forEach when

but that still doesn't define the action that would happen with the text. you are stupid if you cant realise with simple logic that this as a general feature is completely unviable

@arlomcwalter
Copy link
Member

also this is completely out of scope for starscript, it was designed for simple text processing

@SIMULATAN
Copy link
Contributor

but that still doesn't define the action that would happen with the text

no shit, that's not how the original forEach works either lol

@arlomcwalter
Copy link
Member

arlomcwalter commented Mar 28, 2022

yes it is @SIMULATAN

for each something -> action

@SIMULATAN
Copy link
Contributor

yes it is @SIMULATAN

for each something -> action

See, forEach != for each something -> action

@Funtimes909
Copy link
Contributor Author

but that still doesn't define the action that would happen with the text

no shit, that's not how the original forEach works either lol

I seemed to have started an argument here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants
@arlomcwalter @C10udburst @SnivyLlama @SIMULATAN @Funtimes909 @DesiCow @machiecodes and others